A revision can only make things better, so let's get into the tests and see just how well Cooler Master did with the Hyper 212 Plus.ДЄs I mentioned, Cooler Master did a bit of redesigning and incorporated some new ideas along the way. I will however point out all the differences from the original design to the Hyper 212 Plus.ДЇrom what I remember of the Hyper 212 it was a descent cooler. solution Chris created and what we use here today. I cannot make a direct comparison of temperatures however, as my testing method at that time was very different from the T.E.C.C.

They also got together with the engineers to develop an all new mounting hardware, which are welcomed changes in my eyes. Not only is the actual cooler a bit different this time around, but they went with another style of fan. Rethinking a few things after the original Hyper 212 was released, Cooler Master saw the need to take the 212 back to the drawing board and see what they could do to offer a better solution. Yet this cooler has what it takes to keep temperatures at bay. To me the Hyper 212 was a good design, and very efficient for the lack of total surface area with all the missing middle bits of the fins. I was able to test that cooler myself, but it was prior to my time with TweakTown, but I still remember what the 212 had to offer. This was one of the few, at the time, to offer a gap in the middle of the fin sets.

I'm sure at this point most of you have seen or heard of the Hyper 21 from Cooler Master.

Cooler master hyper 212 evo review ltt